Conversation on Record Management during KM Singapore 2011

A two-day KM conference: KM Singapore 2011 ended on 2 September. The conference was held at the Intercontinental Hotel, Bugis, Singapore. The organiser, iKMS (information and Knowledge Management Society of Singapore), successfully invited three rock-stars of the KM world, to speak in the conference:

I admire Gary Klein’s work on decision-making. I like James Robertson’s view on the intranet. And I think Patrick Lambe is one of the most talented taxonomists in the KM world. (There are other speakers, of course. But I’m not familiar with their work – and thus I can’t comment on them).

I have only one regret: I missed the highly-anticipated Klein’s, Robertson’s and Lambe’s talk. (It’s not intentional. I swear)

Thankfully, iKMS is far-sighted. They know that there will be many busy professionals like me (In fact, they know me. They know that I came late. Gosh, I hope they don’t ban me). So, they blog about the talks. Check it out in KM Singapore website.

I was very busy at work. I’m not making excuses here. I’m helping the organisation that I worked for, to roll-out new sharepoint 2010-based intranet. And if you have experienced this before, you’d know that it’s a gigantic task!

Whatever task that you ask your colleagues to do, they won’t do it until the very last minute. It’s not that they are a bunch of evil, blood-sucking vampires. They will prioritise their work over and above intranet. And if you think you could convince them through reasoning, i.e. telling them that intranet is part of their work, asking them to think long term, etc - you are dead wrong (they simply couldn’t care less).

okay, my rant ends here (thanks for listening. Pheew, I need to let some air out).

Luckily, after the conference was over, I met and conversed with Bill Proudfit (twitter: @baoman | blog) – a KMer from Hong Kong. He is a highly respected record-and-content management professional with decades of experience.

Bill Proudfit (left) and me (right)

He gave me some valuable tips and ideas on managing contents/records in the intranet. Here are some takeaways that I got from our conversation:

  • Don’t try to educate people on the difference between documents and records. He said, “differentiating between records and documents is a crazy concept.” I agree with Bill. At some point, people wonder when they should promote documents to become records. And they wouldn’t bother doing it.
  • All contents – including pages in your intranet – should be part of record management system. People often missed out this. Contents on pages can become obsolete too. That’s when you should archive the pages.
  • Get people to validate the freshness of contents in the intranet. This means you need to have a robust publishing workflow, that could notify people when they should validate the contents. A good timeframe would be twelve months from the publishing date.
  • Limit the use of fonts in your documents/records in the intranet. You wouldn’t want your intranet to contain various types of fonts in various sizes, would you? Your contents will look unorganised, unprofessional and unfocused.
  • Almost all contents in the old intranet are junk contents. This is the main reason why content migration is so darn difficult. If most contents in the old intranet are junk, then who is going to clean and rewrite the contents? The content owners wouldn’t bother. Besides, they may not know, how to write online contents. My advise is: Hire professional content writers to do the grunt work. Don’t waste your money to train the content-owners on content writing. It is not a skill that anyone can easily pick up.

Any thoughts/ideas on record/content management? Let me know. And if you attend the KM Singapore, or follow the event on twitter, share your experience. What did you learn? How did you find the event?

Advertisement

2 thoughts on “Conversation on Record Management during KM Singapore 2011

  1. I don’t think anyone was going to confuse you (right) with me (left) Roan :-) Good blog, I agree with all of your points. It is true that when you have the ‘old’ intranet and the ‘new’ intranet the old content is almost completely useless. Even if it has informational value the format is wrong so time has to be spent cleaing it up. I would be cautious about hiring too many / too much professional content writers to just ‘do the grunt work’ ~ it will almost certainily make people expect there will always be someone there to do it for them and there won’t be anyone at some point in the future. You will run out of money and then what will they do? Intranets do need some dedicated content providers and in addition some on-the-fly easily user-generated content. Helping people to learn how to make content can work. This is where the professional content writers need to provide some advice, hand-holding, reviewing, commenting, facilitating. Building up a small group of the dedicated content providers is likely to come out of this process. Much easier said then done but I do believe if time and effort are spent then there will be a good pay-off.

    • Hi Bill,

      Thanks for reading my post. Yes, I agree with you that organisations need to cultivate a community of content managers eventually. Organisations can’t afford to continuously use hired hands to manage their contents.

      Thanks for the useful tips. It was great meeting you. I hope we can meet again. Perhaps in next year KM Hong Kong or Singapore?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s